If you are wondering about whether you need a new viscous coupling, here is
how to tell:
1. According to the manufacturer of the viscous couplings, the VC is only built to last 100,000kms (about 65,000 miles). It would be silly to replace it until it shows actual signs of failure, however.
2. The actual sign of failure is usually that the VC gets too aggressive and starts coming on too much and too hard. In this case it is an emergency because then your transmission components are fighting each other and you can destroy them quickly. You can still drive around on a too-aggressive VC without destroying your drivetrain if you remove the center driveshaft from the vehicle--but then, of course, you will not have four wheel drive. If you decide to do this, you can drive around in two wheel drive for years without harming your vehicle and without replacing your VC. The symptom that would cause you to know that your VC is too aggressive is usually that when you enter a paved parking lot and you make tight turns after a period of highway driving that the vehicle seems to want to stop as though you had put the brakes on--the vehicle simply hates tight turns. Sometimes there is a binding and bucking sensation while driving with the steering wheel turned all the way to its limits. Some on the Syncro list, notably Rainer, think there should be *no* scrubbing of tires whatsoever in tight turns, but I feel that a slight scrubbing or resistance to tight turning is normal and will not hurt your car. When the scrubbing is enough, after a period of highway driving, to actually cause your van to want to stop rather than simply slow down then it is time to change the VC, particularly if you have very high miles. (In support of Rainer's position, by the way, Mick Kalber of Hawaii reports that after changing his VC the scrubbing he felt went away completely. Others report the same thing. Others report that after changing the VC, their car still fights tight turns, but the effect is not increased after highway driving, and the effect is extremely mild in effect.)
3. Less often, the VC fails by simply not coming on at all and you do not have traction to the front wheels.
4. The official factory test is well documented in the archives, but basically, the test is to put a two by four in front of the front wheels (the factory leaves out the two by four but in testing list members have found that even the factory VCs are stiff enough to require the 2x4 to hold the vehicle back) and then jack the rear of the vehicle up in the air with a rolling jack under the car and then very slowly and carefully let the clutch out in first or low gear. After a few tries you will find that you can let the clutch out with the engine running and the VC will allow enough slop to let the wheels stay still at one end of the vehicle without climbing over the two by four while the engine turns the wheels at the other end of the vehicle. If you cannot pass this test, then you should consider buying a viscous coupling immediately in order to avoid rapidly destroying your transmission. Be sure and perform this test soon after highway driving for 20 miles or so or it may not uncover a problem. Note that if you can pass test #4 ONCE out of several tries, then you have passed test #4. That is, you can fail test #4 four times in a row but if you can get the vehicle to pass once then you are OK.
5. Experience has shown that a failure on *either* test #4 or test #2 is sufficient cause to change your VC. That is, it is possible for you to have some nasty scrubbing in tight turns after highway driving as described above in test #2 but that your vehicle can still survive a challenge of test #4. Nevertheless, in this case, you should probably change your VC anyway. Sam Walters' vehicle was a case in point on this issue. He passed point #4 above but failed point #2 above. After changing his VC, point #2 above was restored to proper operation and he is glad he did the change.
Note that installing larger than stock motors will typically reveal a marginal VC, that seemed OK before, to now become a very nasty VC, which scrubs too early and is too aggressive. So it is not uncommon after changing the motor to one of larger size to have to also replace the VC. The same goes for weight. If you have a VC that appears marginal try loading 2,000 lbs. of magazines or newspapers into your van, driving for half an hour on the highway, and then replicating the tests above. You will then certainly find out if that VC is on the way out in that case. If it can pass all the tests in this email with 2,000 lbs of old magazines in it, then your VC is probably still OK.
Most VCs *do* fight tight turns very slightly whether they are new or not. You may see emphatic posts from people who have gotten brand new VCs from me that say the VCs do not bind at all, but you will see just as many that say there is still a slight binding after installing a new one they got from me. To some extent, I think the issue is one of nomenclature and degree-- that one person interprets the words slight binding differently from another person or one person is more sensitive to the effect than another person. Case in point: I drove Tom Forhan's vehicle after he had installed a brand new OEM SDP VC that he had gotten from me and I *did* detect a slight scrubbing of tires in a tight turn on pavement (as I expected), but as Tom said, the scrubbing was less than it was before. Thus, it seems that it is a matter of degree, and we have to rely on a subjective feel for how much binding is normal and how much is too much. I am very sensitive, so I suspect that what I call slight binding may to another list member not appear to be binding at all.
One distinguishing indicator of ill health is when the VC becomes more aggressive after highway driving. That is generally a very bad sign, and one has to consider replacing any VC that exhibits that symptom. After eliminating a difference in size between the four tires as the probable cause, if you experience this symptom only ONCE then it is cause for some concern and you should begin thinking about a VC change.
Generally speaking one can calibrate your feeling about your VC by the feelings of the driver when in tight turns on pavement after highway driving. If the driver says, Hummm....it seems like the vehicle does not really want to go when I turn the wheel all the way like this, or some such mild comment then possibly the VC is OK. But if the driver says, Hey, from the sounds I am hearing I really don't think this is good for my car and speaks with some element of alarm in his voice, then the VC is more suspect. I know this is subjective but I am afraid that is where we are on this particular test.
The No-Engagement Test:
Here is how to test whether your VC has failed in the more rare no-engagement mode:
Basically, you jack up the rear wheels so they are off the ground. Then you put the car in, say, low gear and let the clutch out. After a couple of times, you will find with a good VC that you can let the clutch out and the front wheels will still stay on the ground still without the vehicle being propelled forward even with the motor idling. This is with the rear wheels off the ground and the front two wheels on the ground.
That is the test that is the standard VC test.
The no engagement test begins at that point. At that point, with the rear wheels off the ground and the front wheels on the ground, if you hit the accelerator the vehicle will climb up over the 2x4 (or try 4x4 for the no engagement test) and move forward. If it fails to move forward at, say, 2,000-2,500 rpm in this condition -- rear wheels off the ground and front wheels on the ground) --then the more rare condition of a no-engagement failure is clearly present.
Another way to do a rear engagement test is in the winter time. Park the van so that the rear two wheels are on sheet ice but the front two wheels are not. Put a 4x4 in front of the front two wheels, or some obstacle of similar proportions. Put the car in drive and let the clutch out. The rear wheels will spin on the ice. But one or the other of the front two wheels (but not necessarily both!) will engage and pull the vehicle forward over the obstacle. If neither of the front two wheels spins (you have to watch both front wheels at the same time, so you need a helper or two), then you have a no-engagement failure. Sometimes, a driver in this scenario will look out his window and see that his left front wheel is not spinning and conclude that his VC is bad. But in actual fact the right front wheel is spinning at that time and so in actual fact the VC is working fine .)
A no engagement failure is usually the result of a seal breaking inside the VC, and the consequent leakage of the VC fluid out of the VC and into the area of the front differential where transmission oil is kept. Thus, no-engagement failures typically result in contaminated front differential oil, which therefore should be changed along with the VC.
Typically, a seal breaking in the VC is a result of severe stress on the VC, possibly caused by the more common binding type of failure covered earlier in this email.
Supply of new OEM and used VCs, their diagnosis and fitting
Hello, this is a generic email being sent to all participants in the Viscous Couplings purchase. You are receiving this email because you sent me an inquiry about these viscous couplings and/or how to participate or indicated that you were wondering about their availability, or made a general inquiry about when to replace yours, or asked a technical question. This email tells you all about diagnosing your viscous coupling and what you need to know to pay for one and receive it from me without getting charged $2,000 by VW or having to pay $1,745 at www.vwparts.com. Also included are installation instructions that tell you how to install it yourself or have your local mechanic do so.
At this time, there are two kinds of brand new OEM VCs available from me:
A. Brand new 2002 VCs manufactured by the Original Equipment Manufacturer in May of 2002. These cost $819 and are, as of early June 2002, on in transit from Europe. They should be ready to ship out as of approximately mid-July.
B. Brand new unused VCs manufactured by the Original Equipment Manufacturer in approximately 1989 and kept in storage from that time until this time. These are in stock and cost $685.
Shipping is a flat $25 to anywhere, so if you want me to ship you out a VC, you may send either $710 or $844 (£462.83 or £549.61 as of 02/07/02 -Ed). The snail mail address to which you should send your check is Derek Drew, 5467 31st Street NW, Washington, DC 20015 or you may pay by PayPal.com to derekdrew@rcn.com.
When sending payment please indicate:
1. Unless you state a different shipping preference, I will most likely use Federal Express Ground service.
2. Do you want me to REQUIRE A SIGNATURE at your end in order for delivery to take place?
3. Am I shipping to a RESIDENCE OR COMMERCIAL ADDRESSES where businesses are located? I need this information in order to prepare your shipping label.
(In addition to the brand new VCs mentioned above, I also have some used VCs available for purchase as well. More information about these appears below in the section About Used Viscous Couplings.)
If you do not specify any shipping method, your VC will be sent by the method most convenient for me. If you do not specify signature delivery, then your VC will have a tracking number attached to it but the delivery person will most likely not insist on getting a signature from you.
Payment Issues
Personal checks are OK, in which case the VCs generally go into the mail within about two or three weeks after I receive your check. Postal money order (quick and easy to get at the Post Office) gets the VC to you faster. If you live in Canada, you can buy postal money orders denominated in US dollars. You can also pay by PayPal www.paypal.com to derekdrew@rcn.com which service will accept a credit card but they make you sign up twice and the process can take a week or so. But being on PayPal is a good thing generally, so it is probably worth your while to sign up with that in any case if you have not already.
Background (Description)
These Viscous Couplings are brand new by the OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) and are not rebuilt. As with the previous VCs, I am able to provide them without a warranty except that they will have the correct torque characteristics and pass the tests described below. In the past, we did have one unit that seemed to be too stiff to the recipient, so I couldn't resist sending out a replacement unit to the person who bought one. The replacement unit turned out to be exactly as stiff as the original one and the recipient decided that was OK. I got the original back and resold it and everybody is happy. In other words, expect your VC to scrub slightly in tight turns in parking lots as a small amount of parking lot binding is normal.
The reason that there is no extended warranty is that:
1) they are brand new and were manufactured by the OEM factory so there shouldn't be anything wrong with them;
2) it is possible for you to fry them quickly if you drive on different size tires or for with differing front/rear tyre pressures for more than short duration.
When you receive your VC you will notice that the filling ports are sealed shut with a blue seal to indicate that they have not been reopened to the air. In every package some extra viscous coupling juice is loose in the container. This is normal after-effects of the manufacturing process, and does not indicate a leaking VC.
If you would like to know more about how I came to get into this, you can see my viscous coupling getting a workout at http://users.rcn.com/derekdrew/Syncro_Madness_Area.htm.
Please rest assured that I will not abandon anyone who is not happy with their VC but after sending out some 50 of them over the last two years and no trouble except the event with the fellow who wanted to exchange his I view the probability of a problem as very low.
Should you buy NOS VC or NNS VC?
People have asked me for my advice about whether to buy the NOS (New Old Stock) OEM VCs manufactured in 1989 or the NNS (New New Stock) OEM VCs manufactured in 2002. My answer is that I don't think it really matters. I have sent dozens of the older VCs out and nobody has returned theirs or reported a problem, so I think you are safe to buy the older ones. But there is a rubber seal in the VCs which is probably best if it is brand new, so there is a possible theoretical advantage to getting a new VC. If it were me, I would probably get the 2002 VC notwithstanding the $125 extra cost of them. Still, if you prefer to spend only $685, rest assured that if you get it and don't like it, I will take it back from you, so you have no risk from going the cheaper route. And as I say, I have sent out about 30 of these and nobody has taken advantage of that offer. All of the VCs, both the 1989 VCs, and the 2002 VCs, were manufactured in the same factory by the same people and are essentially identical. Also, the storage environment of the older VCs has been impeccable -- sealed, humidity-controlled. (Perhaps VWs stock of VCs has also been stored since the early 90s too! Ed.)
What Else Do I Sell At Large Discounts?
-- Ring
and pinion sets for the purpose of mounting larger size tires.
-- 16" trailing arms for the purpose of mounting very large size tires
-- factory OEM plastic/rubber fender flares originally sold only in Europe
-- front differential lock kits (both the front differentials themselves or
I can retrofit your existing differential to have a differential lock)
-- dashboard switch and plumbing kits to add differential locks to your vehicle
-- Front CV joint protectors
-- Differential lock servos (blue, $76)
-- Special 16" alloy wheels for Vanagon Syncro which have the correct offsets,
load bearing rating, and all other specs
Email me for more information about the items above, or see links in my Vanagon SIG which may appear at the very bottom of this document for more information.
More Background Stuff on VCs:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Syncro/message/5133
http://www.vanagon.com/syncros/technica/vc-expert-interview/index.html
http://gerry.vanagon.com/cgi-bin/wa.exe?S1=vanagon
Clive Smith - Club80-90 - 2002